Pensions hole may not derail M&S bid but perhaps it should. There is a £185m liability which shouldn't just go away because it is being taken over. There aren't enough details to know exactly what is at stake but insisting on making good the pension liabilities should not be thought unreasonable.
« Amicus gets pension fear | Main | UK Pensions Update »
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d835024ec553ef00e5503753ae8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference More pension fund liability fun:
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Recent Posts
- UK Pensions Update
- More pension fund liability fun
- Amicus gets pension fear
- WH Smith: Pension liabilities as senior debt
- Cash for Pensions Contributions?
- Positive feedback from pension funds
- Pension Credit -- 10 per cent for the bureaucrats
- Grey Revolution
- Women losing out in retirement shock
- Visa move to beat population drop
Pensions Links
- PPI
- NAPF
- Pensions Institute - Birkbeck
- FSA Pension Reviews
- FT Your Money
- thisismoney-Pensions Fact Files
- Pensions Ombudsman
- OPAS
- John Ralfe
- Help the Aged
- Age Concern
- David Willetts - Conservative
- Andrew Smith - Labour
- Steve Webb - Liberal Democrats
- IFS on Pensions & Saving
- Noel Whiteside
- Pensions-Research.Org
- Pensions Regulators Network
- Gordon Clark
- Oxford Institute of Ageing
- Wharton Pensions
- CeRP
- Estelle James
- Pensions-Research.Org
Comments